<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3020" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>how often does Namlook sell 1000 cds anyway(let
alone ones that cost $25)? I bet its rare. Especially since almost everyone who
purchases music nowadays does it via the internet and mp3 sites.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=martin.t.jones@gmail.com
href="mailto:martin.t.jones@gmail.com">Martin Jones</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=andrewdk@sbcglobal.net
href="mailto:andrewdk@sbcglobal.net">Andrew Keyser</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=faxlist@2350.org
href="mailto:faxlist@2350.org">faxlist@2350.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 15, 2007 1:20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: (fax) Re: DTS 5.1 music - is
it or isnt it ?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Seems another strange PK decision to be honest...trying to
offset the money he makes, or not confident that 1000 people will pay €25 (or
bucks!) for a new CD? Hmmmm...<BR><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 1/13/07, <B class=gmail_sendername>Andrew
Keyser</B> <<A
href="mailto:andrewdk@sbcglobal.net">andrewdk@sbcglobal.net</A>>
wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Yes,
these are fully produced 5.1. I honestly don't see how you could expect
Namlook to approve of anything less. I kind of doubt it's a sales gimmick.
If you do the math, 1000 copies, $15 each (or 15 euros, for our Martin) is
less than 500 at $25/25 eur (he's cut the limitation in half from 1000 to
500, it seems, for most of these DTS releases -- and even the latest non-DTS
ones, ie Gate Zero - Black Dust). <BR><BR><BR><BR>I would seriously like to
see a good portion of the historic fax catalog rereleased in 5.1. But then,
it most likely WILL be "fake" 5.1, since it was probably not mixed and
monitored in 5.1.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Andrew<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-----
Original Message ----<BR><BR>From: mu <<A
href="mailto:theendoftime@btinternet.com">theendoftime@btinternet.com</A>><BR><BR>To:
<A href="mailto:faxlist@2350.org">faxlist@2350.org </A><BR><BR>Sent:
Saturday, January 13, 2007 6:36:14 AM<BR><BR>Subject: (fax) Re: DTS 5.1
music - is it or isnt it ?<BR><BR><BR><BR>Hi
everyone<BR><BR><BR><BR>
i see some of the new fax cds are 2 - 1 is DTS 5.1 ? my question is , is
this like a stereo recording converted to 5.1 or is it fully produced 5.1
music with panning between all 4/5 speakers ? i dont have 5.1 system but
might be tempted if the music is made in 5.1 ?anyone tried or tested the 5.1
quality yet and do any of the 5.1 fax releases have panning tricks where it
goes all round the room.Some 5.1 music isnt . . . its stereo masters
converted to 5.1 , not recorded in studio and sounds
placed using 5.1 monitoring.Interested to know whether namlooks recording
and monitoring in 5.1 , if he is then thats a BIG step forward.Though how do
you then make a stereo version from a mixed amd monitored 5.1 mix >? i
maybe in wrong place to ask this :) and shoudl go studio forum maybe
! but do wonder as i made music and looked into
5.1 , i wonder if people compared the 5.1 versions and the stereo
cd versions ? and noted difference.Leap forward or sales gimmick.I once
setup eno style surround system ( bi wire secopnd set of speakers behind you
to positives on your amp if it has twin sets of speaker outs on it and hey
prestos , you have surround system with very nice and unusual 3d quality.
<BR><BR><BR><BR>Ps i read somewhere 5% of people have 5.1 system in home
?<BR><BR><BR><BR>Ppsp wouldnt it be nice if fax rereleased all
their catalogue as 5.1 and even stuff like world reciever
!!!!!<BR><BR><BR><BR>anyone have any answers ?
<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>faxlist
mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:faxlist@2350.org">faxlist@2350.org</A><BR><A
href="http://2350.org/mailman/listinfo/faxlist">http://2350.org/mailman/listinfo/faxlist
</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>faxlist mailing
list<BR>faxlist@2350.org<BR>http://2350.org/mailman/listinfo/faxlist<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>