(fax) Koolfang III art

[Trevor Cordes]

> i read your post and now here are my insights... you're a dickhead.... .

You're welcome to your 2 cents, though vulgarity is hardly called for. I
don't recall ever using vulgar insults on this list in order to get my
point across.  Resorting to such expletives is usually a sign of a lack
of any real argument or real thought into the matter; mental laziness if
you will.

> while i may insult you with my texts. you insult me with your ignorance.

Keep in mind Adre:
a) we are just looking at the low-rez PDF image, whereas you have the
advantage of seeing the high-rez original (and probably working with it
a for along period of time)
b) you may even have taken the photo? or know who the model is?
c) I'm obviously not the only one who at first glance thought it was a
guy.  I'm looking at the PDF again now and it still looks like a guy to
me, but it is slightly ambiguous I guess.

If you reread my original post (quoted below), you'll see that I was
making a light-hearted poke at the fact I thought it was a guy.  I never
said it was bad.  In fact, I thought it was rather gutsy of FAX to be
somewhat controversial (within the mostly-male FAX audience) if it *had*
been a guy.  I just wanted to start a dialogue on the art, which I seem
to have succeeded at!

And why is it that everytime someone mentions something remotely
involving the sexes today that you instantly get labelled as a homophobe
or sexist?  I guess discussing such matters is too taboo.

On 17 Mar 2005, Trevor Cordes wrote:
> What's up with the cover art on the new Koolfang 3 (as seen on the PDF)?
> Is PK trying to give us some shock treatment, or maybe his SO felt it was
> payback time for Air 4?  ;-)